The Body Of God s Image - 1781 Words

Most believe that they were made in God’s image, however, Sallie McFague believes that God exists not only on humanoid aspects, but also on a microscopic aspect. The body of God is the universe and everything included in it; the animals, the trees, the oceans, the bacteria. We, as human beings, are responsible to take care of the world and its environment. We need to come to the realization that we are all connected, and that everything, not just everyone, is a piece of God. So who is Sallie McFague? Well, she was born in 1933 on the 25th of May in Quincy, Massachusetts, and when she went to higher schooling she received a Bachelor’s degree in English Literature from Smith College in 1955. Soon after, in 1959 she married Eugene TeSelle,†¦show more content†¦level in some countries and with an equivalent value to the â€Å"Doctor of Science.† According to Wesley J. Wildman, a student at the Graduate Theological Union in Berkeley, during her time at Yale, she was influenced by the dialectical theology of Karl Barth. This theology was Protestantism which was developed Post-WWI. Dialectical theology is characterized as a re-evaluation of the teachings of the Reformation, and it is characterized as a reaction against doctrines of 19th-century liberal theology. The theology emphasizes the role of theologian aiding the preaching of God s word, giving them the responsibility as the helper and critic of the preacher. She gained different perspectives from Karl Barth and reflected on one of her former teachers, H. Richard Niebuhr. Now, according to Wesley J. Wildman, Sallie Mcfague understood Niebuhr’s recognition of liberalism s concern for involvement, perspective, the symbolic imagination and the appearance of the emotions. The influences of these two people are major insights into the content of the McFague’s t heology which are always prevalent in her work. Sallie McFague has written many works pertaining to feminism and the problems facing the world today including poverty, increasing difference poor and rich, and ecological devastation. One of her books, The Body of God, eliminates the last traces of anthropocentricism which Sallie McFague believes has corrupted Christianity with disastrous consequences for the world and

Evaluation of Different Pricing Strategies Free Essays

The models are based on the average cost approach to price setting but differ slightly In detail. The paper Initially examines the models from an analytical point of view. The paper then describes a simulation model used to evaluate the effect of both decision approaches over time. We will write a custom essay sample on Evaluation of Different Pricing Strategies or any similar topic only for you Order Now While the models are analytically similar the simulation results show that the long run behavior of the firm is significantly different under each approach. This work is part of the author’s PhD research and represents ongoing rather than completed work. Please do not quote without prior permission. Introduction This paper continues the author’s examination of firm growth using analytical and simulation modeling methods and which has already been discussed in Brady (1999; AAA, b and c; 2001). This paper specifically examines firm growth under two different managerial policies both of which use the average cost including demand pricing assumption discussed in Brady (2001). Methodology Two models identical in all respects but one were used in this research. Both models used the average cost including demand approach IEEE. Firms produce product at a certain cost and then set out to sell that product at a marked up price. The models defer in the policy adopted by the firm when production exceeds demand for their product. The firm in model A sells whatever quantity it can at Its marked up price as documented In Brady (2001). The firm In model B sells the quantity It produces at the price the market will bear [e. It sells at the price determined by the firm’s demand curve. Model A Is more realistic In that firms Immediately realism that they have exceeded their demand curve In that they are unable to sell product at the marked up price and either they Increase Inventory or goods perish. Model B Is less realistic In that firm’s cannot determine price with certainty from the demand curve (they do not know their demand curve with certainty): in practice firms must determine this price by some kind of atonement mechanism. Note Tanat tons osculation does not model ten atonement process itself; instead it determines the new price directly from the demand curve. In summary, when production exceeds demand, under model A the firm sells less product than it anticipates but holds its price whereas under model B the firm sells all it produces but at a lower price. Specifically model B differs from model A as follows: the demand function (P = a – BC) used is the inverse function to that used in model A (Q = a – BP); these two expressions are functionally equivalent. The models also differ in that in model A units sold were equal to the units produced or units demanded, whichever is the lower; in model B the price at which goods are sold is equal to the marked up price or the demand price (e. The price given by the demand function), whichever is the lower. In all other respects, including the values of all parameters, the models are identical. In the case of both models demand is held constant throughout the simulation ‘e. The demand curve does not shift upwards or downwards during the simulation. Also, depreciation has been set to zero during the simulation and fixed costs remain constant throughout the simulation (IEEE. There is no step increase in fixed costs as described in Brady, 2001). Results The results of the simulation for model A are shown in figures 1, 2, 3 and 4. Examining firstly firm size, as measured by capital, we see in figure 1 that the firm increases in size until approximately period 50 and then firm size remains more or sees constant. To see why this is so we examine firm retained earnings as shown in figure 2. Here we see retained earnings increase monotonically until period 42 and then decrease asymptotically to zero. Figure 3 shows both revenue and total cost and clearly demonstrates this decline in margin. Here we see the firm maintaining its margin percentage until period 42; margin then declines dramatically until approximately period 60; margin continues declining asymptotically to zero. 01 2 0 1 Capital Accumulated_loss 125021002 Time Figure 1. Model A: Capital Retained_earnings 0050100 Figure 2. Model A: retained earnings This decline in earnings is due to the fact that production exceeded demand in period 42 as shown in figure 4. From that period onwards the firm incurred an increasing cost of overproduction and gradually its margin eroded completely. Although the change in period 42 is abrupt the firm comes smoothly to an equilibrium state (although unfortunately for the firm this equilibrium state is one of zero profitability). On the positive side, the firm never makes a loss as it stops increasing production at a point before its price drops below cost. How to cite Evaluation of Different Pricing Strategies, Papers

International Institutions and Organisations

Question: Discuss about the International Institutions and Organisations. Answer: Introduction: Realism is the only theory that can explain the current system of global governance Global governance or world governance is a process of cooperative leadership and political integration of bringing multilateral public agencies, national governments and civil society together (Cabrera, 2011). Global governance aims at negotiating responses that affect more than one region or state and involves institutionalization. The concept of international relations is in a debate if realism is the only theory that explains the current system of global governance. As argued by Stephen Walt, the complete diplomat of the future shall remain aware of realists emphasis on power, reflect on constructivist vision of change and liberals awareness of domestic forces in mind (Ralston, 2013). In an anarchic state, there is nobody hierarchically superior or coercive. Therefore, the realists argue that international cooperation among states is unlikely as the states can never trust each other but themselves. According to a traditional realist Hans Morgenthau, international politics is related with struggle for more power (D'Anieri, 2016). The realists focus on relative gains. They do not favour absolute benefits. It is argued that if one region gains greater power than another, it shall act as a threat to the other states national security. In this new era, realism asserts that international institutions might mitigate for establishing international relations or anarchy while eliminating the idea of a sovereign state. The international system shall remain unchanged and the legitimate use of violence shall be eliminated since the institutions shall have no real power over sovereign states (Dunne, Kurki, Smith, 2013). However, the liberal theory states that international cooperation is possible since they believe in absolute gains as opposed to realists. The liberals do not disagree with the fact that the states shall try to work for their own national interest. But, in terms of absolute advantage, the liberals state that spread of free trade shall reduce the likelihood of conflict. As observed by Michael Doyle, global governance is identified with an essential principle of freedom of individual. The liberal perspective argues that at a minimum heterogeneous state of peace and war, the world could become a state of global peace where war shall disappear (Cabrera, 2011). Doyle further argues that states can be differentiated in a manner they deal with individual rights. Liberals believe that the interest of states can be extended beyond protection of human rights. Further, constructivism deals with norms, rules and institutions constituting interest of states and other international bodies (Dunne, Kurki, Smith, 2013). The theory claims that that the distribution of cultures and ideas determine the shape of international system. The constructivists argue that the capabilities of determining the nature of international system is possible because of the ideas people attach to them (Pease, 2015). It is concluded that realism is the only theory that can explain the current system of global governance. The pluralist approach may be applied for explaining order, power, norms and change. Realists acknowledge the existence of civil society, globalization and transnational forces. It explains the current theory of global governance as it emphasizes on the strategies to improve international competition. References Cabrera, L. (2011).Global governance, global government(p. 91). Albany: State University of New York Press. D'Anieri, P. (2016).International politics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. Dunne, T., Kurki, M., Smith, S. (2013).International relations theories. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pease, K. (2015).International Organizations. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis. Ralston, S. (2013).Philosophical pragmatism and international relations(p. 178). Lexington Books: USA.

The Allegory Of The Cave Essays (1044 words) - Platonism, Analogy

The Allegory Of The Cave ?The Allegory of the Cave,? by Plato: Theory of Dimensions In Plato's' The Allegory of the Cave, allows an individual to realize that which they already know. The situation in the cave seems dark and gloomy, like a place no one would ever want to go. However, the reality is that some people are at a point in their lives where that is where they are, in their own ?cave?. The people that are in Plato's' cave, the prisoners, have always been there. They all have their legs and necks chained and cannot move. They cannot turn their necks or bodies to look around them. The cave is very dark and there is a fire in the distance. There is a wall in front of them and men are frequently carrying tools and vessels and various shaped objects with them. This creates different shaped shadows for the prisoners to view. All that they have seen or ever known is what is in front of them, a two-dimensional world. A two-dimensional world would represent people that only saw what was in front of them. Plato said to Glaucon, ? To them, I said, the truth would be literally nothing but the shadows of the images.? One could only imagine, never seeing or having any previous knowledge of people or objects, only shadows on a wall. Like some people today, all the prisoners know is what is in front of them, a warped perception of reality. If a person only accepts what is in front of them, they too are living in a two-dimensional world. The shadows, to the prisoners are reality because it is all that they have ever known. They don't know that they are distorted and are a reflection of something that is real. One example that Plato might use if he were alive today would be a movie theatre. The movie projector would be the fire. The film showing would be the shadows reflected on the wall. The viewers are the prisoners. The shadows on the wall can be compared to most movies that are viewed today because they are not reality but a warped representation of it. If the viewer or prisoner chooses to accept what is in front of them as reality then they are in a sense choosing to live in a two-dimensional world. A prisoner would have to believe that there is more to life than what has been put in front of them in order to change the situation and advance into a three-dimensional world. In a three-dimensional world people are able to interact with one another and use their senses. One would accept and be able to understand a new reality. For example, if the prisoners were released, they would be curious to turn around and look behind them or walk towards the light, it is human nature. It would also be hard to do. The light would burn their eyes and the outside world would be a major change and might be hard to accept. Naturally, the prisoners would be scared and hesitant, but in order to move into the next world, one must be strong and escape from the cave in order to find a true reality. Once they seek the knowledge and good things in life that make a person happy, they will be living in a three-dimensional world. Plato thought, my opinion is that in the world of knowledge the idea of good appears last of all, and is seen only with an effort; and, when seen, is also inferred to be the universal author of all things beautiful and right.? For one to live in a three d imensional world, they would not sit back and choose to accept what is in front of them as reality. A person that lives in a two-dimensional world is not truly happy. They have not sought out knowledge or searched for true happiness. For the prisoners trapped in the cave to not ever dream or imagine other realities is showing that they accept where they are in life. It takes a person to truly search for better things in life and simple pleasures to break free from their two-dimensional world